Hello,
Now, considering a narrative can inform the photography --- and the narrative can be develop from a photograph, then my question is:
Does the photographer need to 'narrate' what the photography is, regarless of which came first? (or at least explain what the artwork is)
if so?
Then what is there to appreciate? if the (intrinsic?) value of the 'art' work depends on the creator of that artwork?
1ove, ides.