Peeling off old paint

Peeling off old paint

 

"Art is either plagiarism or revolution."

Paul Gaugin (1848 - 1903)

 

@ Ngujaz: I’m no expert on post impressionism or Gaugin, I’m simply an admirer of his work. If you read what I wrote I wasn’t saying that Gaugin didn’t objectify women, what I said was:

 

“When we photograph with artistic pretensions we must have other objectives besides what we are asked to do, we must give it soul, we must make it personal, it is us, otherwise a job is just a job and photography becomes commercial, which is ok but then we must assume it as so. For me what made me comment was the succession of photos, from the nudes to the meat in the cup. I see a type of work that is assuming to be something it isn't. When I think of nudes I think of Alvarez Bravo, Edward Weston, Gaugin and Goya.”

 

Nowhere here is the critique aimed at the fact that those artists don’t objectify women, what they do is make their work personal and original in a way that defies convention and looks at new ways of representation that move away from the clichés of the time.

Gaugin lived and worked more than 100 years ago, through his work he tried to look for new directions in art, through his Tahiti paintings he was documenting a culture and art that was being destroyed by the French colonial army and missionaries. He did it so by challenging the accepted representations of his time, being the 19th century he did it in a sexist way and maybe with a colonial mindset (probably unaware) that we now can frown at and criticize but at the time it was revolutionary and progressive in a whole lot of different aspects.

Since then there have been several revolutions, both in art and society, both in the way we look at our bodies, sex and gender, certain images we’ve grown used to see in publicity, which might have been novel at one stage, have become stereotypes and repetitions. That is my critique of some image makers that still fall into age old clichés and sell it as art.         

 

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot.”

Salvador Dalí (1904 – 1989)

10h18 Wednesday
06, October
2010
  • love 03
  • switch zoom in/out
  • Caplio GX100
    2010
  • +
03 Comments
 
  1. Jeff Rikhotso

    Interesting

  2. NguJaz

    i like the tactile quality of this.

    My thing with Gaugin is that history paints him as an artist with noble intentions. And personally I'm not convinced of that. Considering his subject matter.

    But of course -- we do judge a people by their art. How can we not afford to? When an artists' job is to represent what they see before them. We can only assume that what they see is based on who they are. If we all see the same environment, what we all concentrate on certainly says something about who we are.

  3. Uno

    My view of Gaugin, based on his life and work, is that he was a very impulsive man, in love with art and trying to make a revolution in art. He might have gone to Tahiti with very selfish intentions, trying to prove something to the art world but I think that what he painted and the messages he tried to give weren't disonest or untrue, he probably fused the two... We now can look at it with a more reserved opinion: was the way in which he portrayed the tahitians paternalistic? Was it an attraction for the exotic that permeated most of Europe in those times and especially the French that made him feel atracted by their culture and art? Did he really considered their art to be at an equivalent to european?
    Was it intentional or was it a product of the times he lived?

Hello, Moeti.

You have to be logged in or registered to leave your mark.

hello (at) 75.co.za